— Exhibit –

— Exhibit —
Refer to the Exhibit.
The exhibit displays an IS-IS topology and IS-IS-related outputs for R1 and R2. The IS-IS
adjacencies between R2 and R3 are in the Up state, but the IS-IS adjacency between R1 and R2

does not attempt to form.
Which two actions will ensure that all IS-IS adjacencies (R1 to R2 and R2 to R3) reach and stay in
the Up state? (Choose two.)

— Exhibit –

— Exhibit —

Refer to the Exhibit.

In the exhibit, R2 is receiving external routing information for the 192.168.16.0/24 prefix and is
redistributing it into IS-IS. R1 has a policy that leaks the 192.168.16.0/24 route into Area 49.1111.
R3 has a policy that leaks the 192.168.16.0/24 route into Area 49.2222. However, the IS-IS
version of the route does not appear in R2’s routing table.
Why does R3’s route leaking policy appear not to be working?

— Exhibit –

— Exhibit —
Refer to the Exhibit.
You administer the network shown in the exhibit. Routers R1, R3, and R4 are sending the same

prefix to R2. All routers are using default local-preference values. You must make the prefix from
R4 the most preferred.
Which two actions accomplish the task? (Choose two.)

— Exhibit –

— Exhibit —

Refer to the Exhibit.
Referring to the exhibit, you must advertise the 200.100.0.0/16 routes from Site 2 to Site 1, but R3

is not currently advertising any BGP routes to R2.
Why is this happening?

— Exhibit –

— Exhibit —

Refer to the Exhibit.
Referring to the exhibit, routers R1 through R5 exist in a fully-meshed IBGP group. You want the

routes received through EBGP on R1 to be advertised to the EBGP peer connected to R5. You
want the routes received through EBGP on R5 to be installed on R1; however, you do not want the
those routes to be advertised to the EBGP peer connected to R1.
Which two actions will accomplish this task? (Choose two.)

— Exhibit –

— Exhibit —

Refer to the Exhibit.

The Client 1 router forwards a route learned from its EBGP peer to the route reflector RR1. The
route reflector forwards the route to the Client 2 router. However, the Client 2 router uses
suboptimal routing to reach the EBGP route destination.
What would cause this behavior?

— Exhibit –

— Exhibit —

Refer to the Exhibit.
You are the administrator for AS 1111 and you want to inform the neighboring AS to use router A2
as the ingress path into your local AS.

Referring to the exhibit, which policy statement action for the export policy on A2 will perform this
task?

— Exhibit –

— Exhibit —

Refer to the Exhibit.

Which configuration parameter would create a routing table as shown in the exhibit?

— Exhibit –

— Exhibit —

Refer to the Exhibit.
Referring to the exhibit, you must ensure that all traffic sourced from C1 and destined to C2 is
associated with the expedited forwarding class. Also, you must ensure that all other traffic not
sourced from C1 is not impacted by the identified modification.
Which method should you use?

— Exhibit –

— Exhibit —
Refer to the Exhibit.
Your network has multiple LSPs between Router A and Router B, as shown in the exhibit. You add
a new LSP between these routers with the following parameters:
LSP5: 20 Mbps; Priority 4 3
Assuming no link has 20 Mbps available, which LSP will be preempted by LSP5?