You have a Layer 3 VPN established between Site 1 and Site 2. You are asked to limit the number
of OSPF routes that the PE devices will accept from the CEs.
Which statement is correct?

How would you copy the BGP prefix 192.168.42.0/24 from VRF-A.inet.0 to VRF-B.inet.0?

You are asked to share a customer’s routes between two separate Layer 3 VPNs. The VPNs must
remain separate. None of the shared routes should be sent to the remote PE devices.
Which two configuration elements are used to meet these requirements? (Choose two.)

— Exhibit –
[edit protocols ospf area 0.0.0.2]
user@router# show
area-range 0.0.0.0/1 restrict;
interface ge-0/0/1.0;

— Exhibit –Refer to the Exhibit.
You have an OSPF area configured as shown in the exhibit.
Which two statements are true? (Choose two.)

— Exhibit –

— Exhibit —

Refer to the Exhibit.
In the exhibit, you must configure an OSPF virtual link between R2 and R3 to facilitate
communication between Area 0 and Area 2.
Which two addresses should you use as the neighbor IDs of the virtual link endpoints? (Choose
two.)

— Exhibit –

— Exhibit —

Refer to the Exhibit.
In the exhibit, an OSPF virtual link is established between R2 and R3. However, R4 cannot reach
any external destinations.
What must you do you allow R4 to reach external destinations?

— Exhibit –user@router> show route receive-protocol rip 2.2.2.2
inet.0: 15 destinations, 15 routes (15 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, – = Last Active, * = Both
50.50.0.0/26 *[RIP/100] 00:09:12, metric 2, tag 0
> to 2.2.2.2 via fe-3/0/0.2
50.50.1.0/24 *[RIP/100] 00:32:24, metric 2, tag 0
> to 2.2.2.2 via fe-3/0/0.2
50.50.2.0/24 *[RIP/100] 00:32:24, metric 2, tag 0
> to 2.2.2.2 via fe-3/0/0.2
50.50.3.0/25 *[RIP/100] 00:32:24, metric 2, tag 0
> to 2.2.2.2 via fe-3/0/0.2
50.50.4.0/25 *[RIP/100] 00:32:24, metric 2, tag 0
> to 2.2.2.2 via fe-3/0/0.2
50.50.4.128/25 *[RIP/100] 00:32:24, metric 2, tag 0
> to 2.2.2.2 via fe-3/0/0.2
50.50.5.0/26 *[RIP/100] 00:32:24, metric 2, tag 0
> to 2.2.2.2 via fe-3/0/0.2
50.50.5.64/26 *[RIP/100] 00:32:24, metric 2, tag 0
> to 2.2.2.2 via fe-3/0/0.2
50.50.5.128/26 *[RIP/100] 00:32:24, metric 2, tag 0
> to 2.2.2.2 via fe-3/0/0.2

— Exhibit —

Referring to the exhibit, how should an export policy be configured to export only the 50.50.1.0/24
RIP summary route into OSPF?

— Exhibit –

— Exhibit —
Refer to the Exhibit.
Each router in the exhibit is receiving three copies of the same IS-IS LSP from the other three
routers in the topology. The additional copies of the IS-IS LSPs are causing additional processing
overhead on each router. You want to reduce the overhead required to process the additional
copies of the same IS-IS LSP.
Which feature accomplishes this task?

— Exhibit –

— Exhibit —
Refer to the Exhibit.
The exhibit displays an IS-IS topology and IS-IS configuration for R1, R2, and R3. R3 is
redistributing the 10.100.100.0/24 route into IS-IS as an external IS-IS route. However, the
10.100.100.0/24 route is automatically being leaked into Area 49.2222.
How do you stop the automatic route leaking of the 10.100.100.0/24 prefix?

— Exhibit –

— Exhibit —
Refer to the Exhibit.
The exhibit displays an IS-IS topology and an IS-IS configuration for R3 and R4. R4 cannot reach
any external destinations or addresses located in Area 49.1111.

How would you ensure that R4 can reach external destinations and addresses located in area
49.1111?