Which firewall filter configuration do you use?
Referring to the exhibit, you are asked to rate-limit traffic from Web-Server to the subnet where
Mal-User is located. All other traffic should be permitted.
Which firewall filter configuration do you use?
which class of service component?
…
if-exceeding {
bandwidth-limit 1m;
burst-size-limit 3k;
}
then discard;
The configuration in the exhibit is associated with which class of service component?
which type of classifier is being used in this CoS configuration?
[edit firewall family inet filter COS-CLASSIFIER]
user@router# show
term MANAGER {
from {
source-address {
192.168.200.0/25;
}
destination-address {
100.100.100.1/32;
} }
then {
forwarding-class expedited-forwarding;
accept;
}
}
term ALL-OTHER-TRAFFIC {
then accept;
}
[edit interfaces ge-0/0/1]
user@router# show
unit 0 {
familyinet {
filter {
input COS-CLASSIFIER;
}
address 192.168.200.1/24;
}
}
Referring to the exhibit, which type of classifier is being used in this CoS configuration?
which type of classifier is being used in this CoS configuration?
[edit class-of-service]
user@router# show
interfaces {
ge-0/0/2 {
unit 0 {
classifiers {
inet-precedence default;
} } }
}
Referring to the exhibit, which type of classifier is being used in this CoS configuration?
which next-hop IP address will be used for the destination IP address 192.168.1.142?
user@router> show route protocol static
inet.0: 12 destinations, 12 routes (12 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, – = Last Active, * = Both
192.168.1.128/27 *[Static/5] 00:03:13
>to 10.20.106.10 via fe-0/0/5.1
192.168.1.144/29 *[Static/5] 00:03:13
>to 10.20.14.131 via ge-0/0/0.0
192.168.1.192/27 *[Static/5] 00:03:13
>to 10.18.1.1 via ge-0/0/1.0
192.168.1.128/28 *[Static/5] 00:01:06
>to 10.20.14.130 via ge-0/0/0.0
Given the routing entries shown in the exhibit, which next-hop IP address will be used for the
destination IP address 192.168.1.142? (Assume that only static routes are available for the
destination.)
which next-hop IP address will be used for the destination IP address 192.168.1.159?
user@router> show route protocol static
inet.0: 12 destinations, 12 routes (12 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, – = Last Active, * = Both
192.168.1.128/27 *[Static/5] 00:03:13
>to 10.20.106.10 via fe-0/0/5.1
192.168.1.144/29 *[Static/5] 00:03:13
>to 10.20.14.131 via ge-0/0/0.0
192.168.1.192/27 *[Static/5] 00:03:13
>to 10.18.1.1 via ge-0/0/1.0
192.168.1.128/28 *[Static/5] 00:01:06
>to 10.20.14.130 via ge-0/0/0.0
Given the routing entries shown in the exhibit, which next-hop IP address will be used for the
destination IP address 192.168.1.159? (Assume that only static routes are available for the
destination.)
what will be the next-hop IP address used for a destination IP address of 192.168.1.1?
user@router> show route protocol static
inet.0: 12 destinations, 12 routes (12 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, – = Last Active, * = Both
192.168.1.0/24 *[Static/5] 00:03:13
>to 10.20.106.10 via fe-0/0/5.1
192.168.1.192/26 *[Static/5] 00:03:13
>to 10.20.14.131 via ge-0/0/0.0
192.168.1.192/27 *[Static/5] 00:03:13
>to 10.18.1.1 via ge-0/0/1.0
192.168.1.4/30 *[Static/5] 00:01:06
>to 10.20.14.130 via ge-0/0/0.0
Using the routing table shown in the exhibit, what will be the next-hop IP address used for a
destination IP address of 192.168.1.1? (Assume that the only routes to this destination are static
routes.)
What would solve this problem?
You are implementing Q-in-Q tunneling on an EX Series switch. You want the tunnel to support all CVLANs; however, only some VLANs are able to send traffic across the tunnel. Switch-1 has the
following configuration:
[edit vlans]
user@Switch-1# show
v100 {
vlan-id 100;
interface {
ge-0/0/0.10;
ge-0/0/1.20;
}
dot1q-tunneling {
customer-vlans [ ];
}
}
What would solve this problem?
What are two reasons for this problem?
You are troubleshooting a problem where an OSPF adjacency between two neighboring routers will
not form. What are two reasons for this problem? (Choose two.)
Which CoS component is causing this problem?
Your Junos device is dropping certain traffic flows, while allowing other traffic flows to pass through
the device unaffected. Which CoS component is causing this problem?