protocols {
isis {
level 1 disable;
interface ge-1/0/0.0 {
level 2 disable;
}
interface ge-1/1/0.0;
interface lo0.0;
}
}

Click the Exhibit button.
Referring to the exhibit, what is the resulting behavior on interface ge-1/0/0?

[edit]
user@router# run show isis interface
IS-IS interface database:
Interface L CirID Level 1 DR Level 2 DR L1/L2 Metric
ge-1/0/2.0 3 0x1 router.00 router.00 10/10
lo0.0 0 0x1 Passive Passive 0/0

Click the Exhibit button.
Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are true regarding the GE interface? (Choose two.)

user@R2> show
protocols {
isis {
export leak;

interface ge-1/1/0.0;
interface ge-1/1/1.0 {
level 1 disable;
}
interface lo0.0;
}
}
policy-options {
policy-statement leak {
term 1 {
from level 1;
to level 2;
then accept;
} }
}

Click the Exhibit button.
R1 and R2 have a Level 1 IS-IS adjacency. R2 participates in both Level 1 and Level 2, and is
receiving routes from a Level 2 neighbor. A policy on R2 has been created to leak routes to Level
1, but R1 is not receiving the routes.
Referring to the exhibit, what is the solution on R2?

user@R1> show
interfaces {
ge-1/1/0 {
unit 0 {
family inet {
address 10.100.1.1/30;
}
family iso;
}
}
lo0 {
unit 0 {
family inet {
address 10.100.10.1/32;
}
family iso {
address 49.1001.0010.0100.00;
} } }
}
protocols {
isis {

interface ge-1/1/0.0 {
level 2 disable;
}
interface lo0.0;
}
}
user@R2> show
interfaces {
ge-1/1/0 {
unit 0 {
family inet {
address 10.100.1.2/30;
} }
}
lo0 {
unit 0 {
family inet {
address 10.100.10.2/32;
}
family iso {
address 49.1001.0010.0200.00;
} } }
}

protocols {
isis {
interface ge-1/1/0.0;
interface lo0.0;
}
}

Click the Exhibit button.
Referring to the exhibit, R1 and R2 are directly connected using interface ge-1/1/0.
What happens as a result of the configurations?