What are two purposes of MAC move limiting? (Choose two.)

Refer to the Exhibit.

— Exhibit –[edit routing-options]
user@R1# show
static {
route 172.29.130.0/17 next-hop 172.30.25.1;
route 172.29.13.0/24 {
next-hop 172.30.25.1;
no-readvertise;
}
route 172.29.16.0/12 next-hop 172.30.25.1;
route 172.29.20.0/24 next-hop 172.30.25.1;
}
[edit protocols ospf]
user@R1# show
export Export_OSPF;
area 0.0.0.0 {
interface ge-0/0/2.0;
interface ge-0/0/3.0;
interface lo0.0;
}
[edit policy-options]
user@R1# show
policy-statement Export_OSPF {
term match-static-routes {
from {
protocol static;

route-filter 172.29.0.0/16 orlonger;
}
then accept;
}
}
— Exhibit –Referring to the exhibit, there is an OSPF policy to redistribute static routes.
Which routes will be propagated to OSPF neighbors?

Refer to the Exhibit.
— Exhibit –user@R1# show interfaces
ge-0/0/8 {
unit 0 {
family inet {
address 172.25.100.2/24 {

vrrp-group 10 {
virtual-address 172.25.100.1;
priority 200;
}
}
}
}
}
— Exhibit –Two routers, R1 and R2, are part of a VRRP master and backup design.
Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are correct about this VRRP deployment? (Choose
two.)

Refer to the Exhibit.
— Exhibit –interfaces {
ge-1/1/0 {
unit 0 {
family inet {
address 10.200.12.1/30;

}
}
}
lo0 {
unit 0 {
family inet {
address 10.200.1.1/32;
}
}
}
}
routing-options {
static {
route 10.200.1.2/32 next-hop 10.200.12.2;
}
autonomous-system 65001;
}
protocols {
bgp {
group 65002 {
local-address 10.200.1.1;
neighbor 10.200.1.2 {
peer-as 65002;
}
}
}

}
— Exhibit –Referring to the exhibit, you are configuring an EBGP peering using the loopback address
between two routers.
Which parameter is needed to complete the configuration?

Refer to the Exhibit.
— Exhibit –user@router> show configuration | no-more
…
interfaces {
ge-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
family inet {
address 10.210.12.131/27;
}
}
}
ge-0/0/1 {
unit 0 {

family inet {
filter {
input fbf;
}
address 10.210.14.1/24;
}
}
}
}
firewall {
filter fbf {
term 1 {
then {
routing-instance fbf;
}
}
}
}
routing-instances {
fbf {
instance-type forwarding;
routing-options {
static {
route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 10.210.12.129;
}
}
}

}
user@router> show route
inet.0: 4 destinations, 4 routes (4 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, – = Last Active, * = Both
10.210.12.128/27 *[Direct/0] 3d 23:21:02
> via ge-0/0/0.0
10.210.12.131/32 *[Local/0] 3d 23:21:17
Local via ge-0/0/0.0
10.210.14.0/24 *[Direct/0] 00:00:07
> via ge-0/0/1.0
10.210.14.1/32 *[Local/0] 00:00:07
Local via ge-0/0/1.0
— Exhibit –What is causing the behavior shown in the exhibit?

Refer to the Exhibit.

The switches shown in the exhibit were just powered on.
What is required to ensure that both of Switch B’s ports are in a forwarding state?

Refer to the Exhibit.
— Exhibit –Router A.
interfaces {
ge-0/0/0 {

unit 0 {
family inet {
address 192.168.1.20/24 {
vrrp-group 27 {
virtual-address 192.168.1.20;
priority 255;
authentication-type simple;
authentication-key <juniper123>;
}
}
}
}
}
}
Router B.
interfaces {
ge-4/2/0 {
unit 0 {
family inet {
address 192.168.1.19/24 {
vrrp-group 27 {
virtual-address 192.168.1.20;
priority 200;
authentication-type simple;
authentication-key <juniper123>;
}

}
}
}
}
}
— Exhibit –Referring to the exhibit, Router B comes up first and preemption is not enabled. Router A assumes
mastership for the virtual IP. Why does Router A assume a mastership role for the IP?

Refer to the Exhibit.

An IP tunnel connects two routers over the Internet as shown in the exhibit.
Which two statements are correct? (Choose two.)

Refer to the Exhibit.
— Exhibit –SITE1:
routing-options {
autonomous-system 65001;
}
protocols {
bgp {
group 65002 {
neighbor 10.200.12.1 {
peer-as 65002;
}
}
}
}
SITE2:
routing-options {
autonomous-system 65002;
}

protocols {
bgp {
group 65001 {
neighbor 10.200.12.2 {
peer-as 65003;
}
}
}
}
— Exhibit –Referring to the exhibit, SITE1 is configuring an EBGP peering with SITE2. SITE2 configured the
incorrect peer AS during a maintenance window and now is unable to change the configuration
until the next maintenance window.
Which configuration would you use on SITE1 to establish the EBGP peering?

Refer to the Exhibit.
— Exhibit –[edit protocols rstp]
user@switch# show
bridge-priority 32k;
max-age 20;
hello-timer 2;
forward-delay 15;
interface ge-0/0/11.0 {
disable;
}

interface ge-0/0/12.0 {
cost 20000;
mode point-to-point;
}
interface ge-0/0/13.0 {
priority 128;
mode shared;
}
interface ge-0/0/14.0 {
edge;
}
bpdu-block-on-edge;
— Exhibit –The exhibit shows the RSTP configuration for your EX Series switch. The switch begins receiving
BPDUs on a port and disables that port.
Which port is disabled?