Within the legal domain what rule is concerned with the legality of how the evidence was gathered?

A.
Exclusionary rule

B.
Best evidence rule

C.
Hearsay rule

D.
Investigation rule

Explanation:
The exclusionary rule mentions that evidence must be gathered legally or it can’t be used. The principle based
on federal Constitutional Law that evidence illegally seized by law enforcement officers in violation of a
suspect’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures cannot be used against the suspect in a
criminal prosecution. The exclusionary rule is designed to exclude evidence obtained in violation of a criminal
defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and
seizures by law enforcement personnel. If the search of a criminal suspect is unreasonable, the evidence
obtained in the search will be excluded from trial. The exclusionary rule is a court-made rule. This means that it
was created not in statutes passed by legislative bodies but rather by the U.S. Supreme Court. The
exclusionary rule applies in federal courts by virtue of the Fourth Amendment. The Court has ruled that it
applies in state courts although the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. (The Bill of Rights—the
first ten amendments— applies to actions by the federal government. The Fourteenth Amendment, the Court
has held, makes most of the protections in the Bill of Rights applicable to actions by the states.)
The exclusionary rule has been in existence since the early 1900s. Before the rule was fashioned, any evidence
was admissible in a criminal trial if the judge found the evidence to be relevant. The manner in which the
evidence had been seized was not an issue. This began to change in 1914, when the U.S. Supreme Court
devised a way to enforce the Fourth Amendment. In Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383, 34 S. Ct. 341, 58 L.
Ed. 652 (1914), a federal agent had conducted a warrantless search for evidence of gambling at the home of
Fremont Weeks. The evidence seized in the search was used at trial, and Weeks was convicted. On appeal,
the Court held that the Fourth Amendment barred the use of evidence secured through a warrantless search.
Weeks’s conviction was reversed, and thus was born the exclusionary rule. The best evidence rule concerns
limiting potential for alteration. The best evidence rule is a common law rule of evidence which can be traced
back at least as far as the 18th century. In Omychund v Barker (1745) 1 Atk, 21, 49; 26 ER 15, 33, LordHarwicke stated that no evidence was admissible unless it was “the best that the nature of the case will allow”.
The general rule is that secondary evidence, such as a copy or facsimile, will be not admissible if an original
document exists, and is not unavailable due to destruction or other circumstances indicating unavailability. The
rationale for the best evidence rule can be understood from the context in which it arose: in the eighteenth
century a copy was usually made by hand by a clerk (or even a litigant). The best evidence rule was predicated
on the assumption that, if the original was not produced, there was a significant chance of error or fraud in
relying on such a copy. The hearsay rule concerns computer-generated evidence, which is considered secondhand evidence. Hearsay is information gathered by one person from another concerning some event, condition,
or thing of which the first person had no direct experience. When submitted as evidence, such statements are
called hearsay evidence. As a legal term, “hearsay” can also have the narrower meaning of the use of such
information as evidence to prove the truth of what is asserted. Such use of “hearsay evidence” in court is
generally not allowed. This prohibition is called the hearsay rule. For example, a witness says “Susan told me
Tom was in town”. Since the witness did not see Tom in town, the statement would be hearsay evidence to the
fact that Tom was in town, and not admissible. However, it would be admissible as evidence that Susan said
Tom was in town, and on the issue of her knowledge of whether he was in town. Hearsay evidence has many
exception rules.
For the purpose of the exam you must be familiar with the business records exception rule to the Hearsay
Evidence. The business records created during the ordinary course of business are considered reliable and can
usually be brought in under this exception if the proper foundation is laid when the records are introduced into
evidence. Depending on which jurisdiction the case is in, either the records custodian or someone with
knowledge of the records must lay a foundation for the records. Logs that are collected as part of a document
business process being carried at regular interval would fall under this exception. They could be presented in
court and not be considered Hearsay.
ROTHKE, Ben, CISSP CBK Review presentation on domain 9.
http://legal- dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Exclusionary+Rule
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exclusionary_rule
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay_in_United_States_law#Hearsay_exceptions