On the basis of the network provided in the exhibit, R3 and R4 are configured to run all connected
links in OSPF Area 1. The network administrator is complaining that traffic destined to
192.168.1.0/24 is being routed to R2, even if R2 is not running OSPF. Which would be the cause
of this problem?
A.
The next hop towards 192.168.1.0/24 at R3 should be 10.1.1.2, which is R2.
B.
The next hop towards 192.168.1.0/24 at R4 should be 10.1.1.1, since R1 is redistributing the
route from EIGRP into OSPF. R3 is forwarding traffic incorrectly.
C.
The next hop towards 192.168.1.0/24 at R4 should be 10.1.2.2, which is R3. R3 should be
load-sharing between R1 and R2 for its next hop.
D.
R4 does not have a route towards 192.168.1.0/24, so the network administrator is wrong in
thinking any traffic is being forwarded there.
Explanation:
When R1 redistributes the the eigrp route into ospf , the external type 5 LSA forwarding address =
10.1.1.2, and so R3 will see it as the next hop to the network 192.168.1.0 /24.