Which IGP protocol is a common choice to EIGRP and OSPF as a routing protocol for large networks?
A. RIPv2
B. IS-IS
C. IGRP
D. OSPFv2
Explanation:
3 Comments on “Which IGP protocol is a common choice to EIGRP and OSPF as a routing protocol for large networks?”
Keithsays:
“OSPF is perhaps the most widely-used interior gateway protocol (IGP) in large enterprise networks. IS-IS, another link-state dynamic routing protocol, is more common in large service provider networks.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Shortest_Path_First
“The metric that RIP uses to rate the value of different routes is hop count. The hop count is the number of routers that can be traversed in a route. A directly connected network has a metric of zero; an unreachable network has a metric of 16. This small range of metrics makes RIP an unsuitable routing protocol for large networks.” http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2/ip/configuration/guide/1cfrip.html
0
0
Keithsays:
“IS-IS is less “chatty” and can scale to support larger networks. Given the same set of resources, IS-IS can support more routers in an area than OSPF. This has contributed to IS-IS as an ISP-scale protocol.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IS-IS
“OSPF is perhaps the most widely-used interior gateway protocol (IGP) in large enterprise networks. IS-IS, another link-state dynamic routing protocol, is more common in large service provider networks.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Shortest_Path_First
IGRP is obsolete.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interior_Gateway_Routing_Protocol
“The metric that RIP uses to rate the value of different routes is hop count. The hop count is the number of routers that can be traversed in a route. A directly connected network has a metric of zero; an unreachable network has a metric of 16. This small range of metrics makes RIP an unsuitable routing protocol for large networks.”
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2/ip/configuration/guide/1cfrip.html
0
0
“IS-IS is less “chatty” and can scale to support larger networks. Given the same set of resources, IS-IS can support more routers in an area than OSPF. This has contributed to IS-IS as an ISP-scale protocol.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IS-IS
0
0
I dont understand the wording of the question…
0
0