The right answer is “show arp”
There is no such command as “show mac-address”, the right command is “show mac-address-table”
0
0
Narjsays:
“show arp” would only be correct if you were on a multilayer switch hosting the gateway for the local subnet(s). I think the question is typo’d.
0
0
hibasays:
Show mac-address is the choise without using tab in writng command
SwitchC#show mac address
Mac Address Table
——————————————-
Vlan Mac Address Type Ports
—- ———– ——– —–
1 0001.c9a3.bc01 DYNAMIC Fa0/2
0
0
kennysays:
only write
Switch#show mac-address
you can see that it is valid, soo the option A is the correct
this command works only write show mac-address, you can try in packet tracert !! is not neccesary add xx-xx-table
Now its clarified…am confused about th answer…thanks lot for
0
0
Answer: B
There is no “show mac-address” command. But notice the “show mac-address-table” and “show mac address-table” do exist.
If option A is “show mac-address-table” then both A & B are correct!
0
0
Yeah it is : B – “Show arp”
A lot of people confuse this question 🙂
0
0
The right answer is “show arp”
There is no such command as “show mac-address”, the right command is “show mac-address-table”
0
0
“show arp” would only be correct if you were on a multilayer switch hosting the gateway for the local subnet(s). I think the question is typo’d.
0
0
Show mac-address is the choise without using tab in writng command
SwitchC#show mac address
Mac Address Table
——————————————-
Vlan Mac Address Type Ports
—- ———– ——– —–
1 0001.c9a3.bc01 DYNAMIC Fa0/2
0
0
only write
Switch#show mac-address
you can see that it is valid, soo the option A is the correct
this command works only write show mac-address, you can try in packet tracert !! is not neccesary add xx-xx-table
Mac Address Table
——————————————-
Vlan Mac Address Type Ports
—- ———– ——– —–
0
0