What will happen?
Review the following truncated output from an Aruba controller for this item.
(example) #show rights logon
access-list List
—————-
Position Name Location
——– —- ——–
1 logon-control
2 captiveportal
logon-control
————-
Priority Source Destination Service Action
——– —— ———– ——- ——
1 user any udp 68 deny
2 any any svc-icmp permit
3 any any svc-dns permit
4 any any svc-dhcp permit
5 any any svc-natt permit
captiveportal
————-
Priority Source Destination Service Action
——– —— ———– ——- ——
1 user controller svc-https dst-nat 8081
2 user any svc-http dst-nat 8080
3 user any svc-https dst-nat 8081
4 user any svc-http-proxy1 dst-nat 8088
5 user any svc-http-proxy2 dst-nat 8088
6 user any svc-http-proxy3 dst-nat 8088
Based on the above output from an Aruba controller, an unauthenticated user assigned to
the logon role attempts to start an http session to IP address 172.16.43.170.
What will happen?
which statements best describe this policy?
Refer to the following configuration segment for this item.
ip access-list session anewone
user network 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 any permit
user host 172.16.1.1 any deny
user any any permit
An administrator wants users to have access to all destinations except 172.16.1.1. Based on
the above Aruba Mobility Controller configuration segment, which statements best describe
this policy? (Choose two)
how will the frame be handled by this firewall policy?
Refer to the following configuration segment for this item.
netdestination “internal”
no invert
network 172.16.43.0 255.255.255.0 position 1
range 172.16.11.0 172.16.11.16 position 2
!
ip access-list session “My-Policy”
alias “user” alias “internal” service_any permit queue low
!
A user frame is evaluated against this firewall policy with the following attributes:
Source IP: 172.17.49.3 Destination IP: 10.100.86.37 Destination Port: 80
Referring to the above file segment, how will the frame be handled by this firewall policy?
what will this policy do with the user frame?
ip access-list session anewone
user network 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 any permit
user any any permit
host 10.1.1.1 host 10.2.2.2 any deny
A user sends a frame with the following attributes:
Source IP: 10.1.1.1 Destination IP: 10.2.2.2 Destination Port: 25
Based on the above Mobility Controller configuration file segment, what will this policy do
with the user frame?
what can you conclude?
ip access-list session anewone
user network 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 any permit
user host 10.1.1.1 any deny
user any any permit
Referring to the above portion of a Mobility Controller configuration file, what can you
conclude? (Choose two)
Which of these are NOT a client attribute that can be configured in user derivation rules?
Which of these are NOT a client attribute that can be configured in user derivation rules?
Which of the following statements is true?
An access port has been placed in trusted mode. The Vlan on the port is in Untrusted mode.
Which of the following statements is true?
Which of the following statements is true?
A port firewall policy is applied to a trunk port that denies controller access. An “allow all” Vlan firewall policy is applied to VLAN 33 on the same port. A user
connected to VLAN 33 on that port attempts to gain access to the controller. Which of the following statements is true?
What is the best way to accomplish this?
A university has 2 departments. Department 1 has its own mobility domain with one controller. Department 2 has multiple controllers configured in a second
domain. The university is planning on offering a new application and needs users to be able to roam between both mobility domains.
What is the best way to accomplish this?
where is the mobility domain defined?
In a master-local controller scenario, where is the mobility domain defined?